A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on metformin co-administration during gonadotrophin ovulation induction or IVF in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing whether metformin co-administration with gonadotrophins for ovulation induction (OI) with timed intercourse or IVF improves outcome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS The quality of reporting of meta-analyses (QUOROM) guidelines were followed. A systematic computerized literature search of three bibliographic databases was performed. RESULTS Eight RCTs were included in the overall review. Meta-analysis demonstrated that the co-administration of metformin to gonadotrophin OI does not significantly improve ovulation [odds ratio (OR) = 3.27; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.31-34.72] or pregnancy (OR = 3.46; 95% CI = 0.98-12.2) rates. Metformin co-administration to IVF treatment does not improve pregnancy (OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 0.84-1.98) or live birth (OR = 2.02, 95% CI = 0.98-4.14) rates but reduces the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (OR = 0.21; 95% CI = 0.11-0.41, P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS Current data on the use of metformin in the gonadotrophin OI or IVF treatment settings are inconclusive because of the review's failure to exclude an important clinical treatment effect. Further RCTs are necessary to definitively clarify whether metformin co-administration during gonadotrophin OI or IVF will improve the efficacy of these treatments in PCOS women.
منابع مشابه
Surgical Ovulation Induction in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review
Background: Currently clomiphene citrate is the first-line treatment to induce ovulation in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Surgical therapy with laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) may avoid or reduce the need for gonadotropins. Objective: To determine the effectiveness and safety of LOD compared with ovulation induction in subfertile women with clomiphene-resistant PCOS. Search...
متن کاملCalcium and vitamin D supplementation effects on metabolic factors, menstrual cycles and follicular responses in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most popular endocrine disorder in reproductive age with unknown etiology and many comorbidities. This systematic review focused on the effectiveness of calcium and vitamin D (Ca/ Vit.D) supplementation on metabolic factors, menstrual cycles, and follicular responses in PCOS patients. Methods: Relevant studies were identified from the followi...
متن کاملMetformin and gonadotropins for ovulation induction in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
The current systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was aimed to evaluate the effects of metformin on reproductive outcomes in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who receive gonadotropins for ovulation induction. After systematic review of electronic databases and websites for registration of RCTs, a total of 7 RCTs reporting data on 1023 cycles w...
متن کاملA systematic review of the reproductive system effects of metformin in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.
OBJECTIVE To review the effectiveness of metformin in restoring regular menstrual cycles and ovulation and achieving pregnancy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). DESIGN Systematic review of pertinent studies identified using the bibliographic databases MEDLINE and EMBASE. References of selected articles identified were hand-searched for additional relevant citations. PATIENT(S)...
متن کاملI-22: Decision Trees for Identifying Predictor of Treatment Effectiveness in Clinical Trials and Its Application to Ovulation in a Study of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Background: Double-blind, randomized clinical trials are the preferred approach to demonstrate the effectiveness of one treatment against another. The comparison is, however, made on the average group effects. While patients and clinicians have always struggled to understand why patients respond differently to the same treatment, and while much hope has been held out for the nascent field of pr...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Human reproduction
دوره 21 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006